首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluation of four subcritical response methods for on-line prediction flutter onset in wind-tunnel tests
【2h】

Evaluation of four subcritical response methods for on-line prediction flutter onset in wind-tunnel tests

机译:评估风洞试验中在线预测颤动发作的四种亚临界响应方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The methods were evaluated for use in tests where the flutter model is excited solely by airstream turbulence. The methods were: randomdec, power-spectral-density, peak-hold, and cross-spectrum. The test procedure was to maintain a constant Mach number (M) and increase the dynamic pressure (g) in incremental steps. The test Mach numbers were 0.65, 0.75, 0.82, 0.90, and 1.15. The four methods provided damping trends by which the flutter mode could be tracked and extrapolated to a flutter-onset q. A hard flutter point was obtained at M = 0.82. The peak-hold and cross-spectrum methods gave reliable results and could be most readily used for on-line testing. At M = 0.82, a p-k analysis predicted the same flutter mode as the experiment but a 6-percent lower flutter q. At the subcritical dynamic pressures, calculated damping values were appreciably lower than measured data.
机译:对这些方法进行了评估,以用于仅通过气流湍流激发颤振模型的测试中。这些方法是:randomdec,功率谱密度,峰值保持和交叉光谱。测试程序是保持恒定的马赫数(M),并以递增的步长增加动态压力(g)。测试马赫数分别为0.65、0.75、0.82、0.90和1.15。四种方法提供了阻尼趋势,通过该趋势可以跟踪颤动模式并将其外推到颤动起始q。在M = 0.82时获得了硬颤动点。峰保持和交叉光谱方法给出了可靠的结果,并且最容易用于在线测试。在M = 0.82时,p-k分析预测的颤动模式与实验相同,但颤动q降低了6%。在亚临界动压力下,计算得出的阻尼值明显低于实测数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号